SML serves many local and state courts as a court recognized expert witness for the prosecution in radar and laser gun speeding trials. During recent years, SML has worked with many prosecutors in Virginia, Ohio, Iowa, California, Oregon, Illinois, New Hampshire, Tennessee, Texas, and South Carolina. Many of these court appearances sought judicial notice for the use of radar and laser speed enforcement systems. Several dealt with Kelly, Frye, and Daubert hearings on the admissibility and acceptance of laser enforcement as an accepted scientific principle. Many prosecutors have provided SML with letters of referral and have used SML services on several occasions. These letters of referral and a Curriculum Vitae/resume are available to interested prosecutors by contacting SML at speed@speedinglimits.com. SML will also provide prices for court appearances with e mail contact. Please allow three weeks notice for court appearance. These courts have relied on SML to provide precedents from other jurisdictions on the admissibility of laser speed readings. Several have asked SML to appear at magistrate and municipal judge state-wide conferences conducting orientation to radar and laser gun usage with the goal of state-wide judicial notice of the speed enforcement systems. During these court appearance, prosecutors have scheduled meetings with local law enforcement agencies. This is done to review with police officials precedents from other national jurisdictions on the use of radar and laser for speed enforcement and new technological trends of enforcement. SML is not an employee of any radar or laser gun manufacturer and is an independent company. SML has received many compliments from different prosecutor’s including the following: (1) “I want to thank you again for your testimony and all the work you did prior to trial. Your testimony has proven invaluable in not only our case, but also cases that have occurred since,” (2) “The judge and all the police officers commented on your knowledge and skill of presentation. It is largely because of the effectiveness of your testimony that the judge made his more far reaching decisions. I highly recommend your services to any other City that needs this sort of specialized testimony,” (3) “The judge was impressed with your expertise and appreciated you demonstrating the lidar for her on the street. The judge and I are also most grateful for the materials you provided. The judge plans to keep her copy permanently for the use by any judge on the traffic court bench. The judge did take judicial notice of the accuracy of lidar and the general acceptance of the scientific principles behind it.” Included in SML’s court presentation are the documents published by the United States Department of Transportation and NHTSA, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT HS 809 812, DOT HS 809 811 which review the federal performance specifications requirements for radar and laser based speed measuring systems. Further, SML presents the laboratory testing requirements of radar and laser systems as promulgated by the federal agencies of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), NHTSA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). A formal listing of approved radar and laser guns taken from the CPL List of the International Association of Chiefs of Police is presented along with court precedents citing of Honeycutt v. Kentucky, Ky.,408 S.W. 2d 421 among other national court decisions. Check www.radarsignals.net for updates.

L serves many local and state courts as a court recognized expert witness for the prosecution in radar and laser gun speeding trials. During recent years, SML has worked with many prosecutors in Virginia, Ohio, Iowa, California, Oregon, Illinois, New Hampshire, Tennessee, Texas, and South Carolina. Many of these court appearances sought judicial notice for the use of radar and laser speed enforcement systems. Several dealt with Kelly, Frye, and Daubert hearings on the admissibility and acceptance of laser enforcement as an accepted scientific principle. Many prosecutors have provided SML with letters of referral and have used SML services on several occasions. These letters of referral and a Curriculum Vitae/resume are available to interested prosecutors by contacting SML at speed@speedinglimits.com. SML will also provide prices for court appearances with e mail contact. Please allow three weeks notice for court appearance.

These courts have relied on SML to provide precedents from other jurisdictions on the admissibility of laser speed readings. Several have asked SML to appear at magistrate and municipal judge state-wide conferences conducting orientation to radar and laser gun usage with the goal of state-wide judicial notice of the speed enforcement systems. During these court appearance, prosecutors have scheduled meetings with local law enforcement agencies. This is done to review with police officials precedents from other national jurisdictions on the use of radar and laser for speed enforcement and new technological trends of enforcement. SML is not an employee of any radar or laser gun manufacturer and is an independent company.

SML has received many compliments from different prosecutor’s including the following: (1) “I want to thank you again for your testimony and all the work you did prior to trial. Your testimony has proven invaluable in not only our case, but also cases that have occurred since,” (2) “The judge and all the police officers commented

on your knowledge and skill of presentation. It is largely because of the effectiveness of your testimony that the judge made his more far reaching decisions. I highly recommend your services to any other City that needs this sort of specialized testimony,” (3) “The judge was impressed with your expertise and appreciated you demonstrating the lidar for her on the street. The judge and I are also most grateful for the materials you provided. The judge plans to keep her copy permanently for the use by any judge on the traffic court bench. The judge did take judicial notice of the accuracy of lidar and the general acceptance of the scientific principles behind it.”

Included in SML’s court presentation are the documents published by the United States Department of Transportation and NHTSA, National

Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT HS 809 812, DOT HS 809 811 which review the federal performance specifications requirements for radar and laser based speed measuring systems. Further, SML presents the laboratory testing requirements of radar and laser systems as promulgated by the federal agencies of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), NHTSA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). A formal listing of approved radar and laser guns taken from the CPL List of the International Association of Chiefs of Police is presented along with court precedents citing of Honeycutt v. Kentucky, Ky.,408 S.W. 2d 421 among other national court decisions. Check www.radarsignals.net for updates.